Cavaliers Spark Life in Playoff Series with Game 3 Rout, Mitchell Drops 43 Against Pacers

by Themba Sweet May 15, 2025 Sports 8
Cavaliers Spark Life in Playoff Series with Game 3 Rout, Mitchell Drops 43 Against Pacers

Donovan Mitchell Explodes Again as Cavaliers Pull Off Must-Win Victory

Donovan Mitchell just keeps raising the stakes. With the Cavaliers on the ropes, he delivered a 43-point masterclass, shredding the Pacers and keeping alive Cleveland’s NBA playoff hopes. Packed with energy and focus from tipoff, the Cavs ran away with a 126-104 victory in front of a buzzing home crowd on May 9, 2025. Suddenly, that 2-0 series hole doesn’t look quite so deep.

The last time the Cavaliers looked this sharp was months ago, but for once, their entire roster was available at tip-off. Cleveland’s usual size advantage meant both Evan Mobley and Jarrett Allen could get into the mix, but as the game got rolling, it was all about Mitchell’s relentless attack. He’s now gone for at least 40 points in back-to-back games, piling pressure on Indiana’s defense from every angle. Whenever Indiana tried to wall off the paint, Mitchell drained perimeter shots; when they drifted outside, he slashed straight to the rim.

Cleveland didn’t rely on Mitchell alone, though. Darius Garland chipped in with steady playmaking, and supporting players like Max Strus and Isaac Okoro hit timely shots to keep Indiana second-guessing. Their offensive rhythm looked much smoother—possessions zipped around, creating open looks. Even so, fans couldn’t help but second-guess. The online chatter ramped up over Mitchell’s shot selection, with plenty arguing he’s gunning too many threes instead of feeding Mobley and Allen down low, especially when Cleveland’s bigs have a clear advantage over Indiana’s lighter frontcourt.

Pacers Falter in Key Moments and Look for Answers Before Game 4

Pacers Falter in Key Moments and Look for Answers Before Game 4

Indiana looked like a different team from those first two games. The second quarter was nothing short of a train wreck, producing only 13 measly points as Cleveland blitzed them in transition and half-court sets. T.J. McConnell, usually the heartbeat of Indiana’s bench, struggled to find any rhythm against Cleveland’s swarming defense. Myles Turner, tasked with anchoring the paint, repeatedly found himself out of position against the Cavaliers’ Cleveland Cavaliers attacking wave. Slow rotations, missed box-outs, and a lack of communication doomed the Pacers, especially when Mitchell started to heat up after halftime.

Cleveland’s win narrows the series gap to 2-1, setting up a Game 4 that suddenly feels like it could turn the momentum entirely. The third quarter saw big moments—a spinning layup from Mitchell here, a backbreaking corner three there—that kept Indiana at arm’s length. Every time the Pacers made a run, the Cavs had an answer, either through assertive drives or sharp ball movement. Indiana now faces big questions: can they adjust defensively, especially on the perimeter and in rotations, and will their own big men stand up to the Cavs’ imposing interior presence?

The intrigue heading into Game 4 is as high as ever. Cleveland has finally shown the version of themselves fans have been waiting for, with Mitchell leading the way but plenty of help from role players who know a thing or two about rising to the moment.

Author: Themba Sweet
Themba Sweet
I am a news journalist with a passion for writing about daily news in Africa. With over 20 years of experience in the field, I strive to deliver accurate and insightful stories. My work aims to inform and educate the public on the continent’s current affairs and developments.

8 Comments

  • rakesh meena said:
    May 16, 2025 AT 14:53
    Mitchell is a beast pure and simple
  • Ayushi Dongre said:
    May 17, 2025 AT 14:15
    The elegance of his decision-making under pressure is almost meditative. One observes not merely scoring, but a symphony of spatial awareness, timing, and restraint masked as aggression. The Pacers, in their desperation, offered him lanes-and he chose, with quiet precision, where to walk.

    It is not merely about volume. It is about the cadence of the game. The way he paused before the step-back, the subtle shift of weight that betrayed nothing until the ball left his fingertips. This is not luck. This is mastery cultivated over years of solitude in empty gyms, long after the crowds had gone.

    And yet, the criticism of shot selection? It is the echo of a society that demands efficiency over artistry. We measure value in assists and efficiency ratings, forgetting that some souls were born to carry the weight of expectation alone.

    When Mobley and Allen are double-teamed, who else is there? The system did not fail. The system simply asked one man to become a universe.

    Perhaps the true tragedy is not that he takes too many shots-but that we have trained ourselves to expect less from him. We call him a gunner, when in truth, he is the only one brave enough to hold the flame.
  • sandeep singh said:
    May 19, 2025 AT 07:12
    This is why India needs to stop watching American trash and start building our own basketball culture. We have athletes, we have discipline, we have hunger-but we waste it on cricket and Bollywood. Mitchell’s fire? That’s what real men do. We should be ashamed we don’t have a single player who can carry a team like this.
  • Sumit Garg said:
    May 20, 2025 AT 02:29
    The phrase 'Cleveland Cavaliers' is redundantly repeated in the article's description of Myles Turner's defensive struggles-an editorial oversight of significant magnitude. Moreover, the notion that Mitchell's 'relentless attack' is a sign of brilliance ignores the fundamental statistical anomaly: his effective field goal percentage on pull-up threes this postseason is below league average for players with >100 attempts. The narrative is constructed, not observed.

    Furthermore, the Pacers' second-quarter collapse was not due to 'lack of communication' but rather a systemic failure in defensive spacing, exacerbated by the absence of a true rim-protecting center who can deter drives without fouling. Indiana's coaching staff, predictably, failed to adjust their pick-and-roll coverage schemes after the first 12 minutes.

    And yet, the media continues to glorify isolation basketball as 'artistry,' while dismissing team-oriented systems as 'boring.' This is not progress. This is regression masked as passion.
  • Sneha N said:
    May 20, 2025 AT 14:50
    I just... I can't. 😭💔

    Donovan Mitchell... the way he looked at the crowd after that last three... like he was saying, 'I told you so.'

    And then the way the camera caught Evan Mobley smiling like a proud big brother... 😭

    My heart. My heart is full. I'm crying. I'm not even from Cleveland. But this? This is poetry in motion. I need a tissue. A whole box. Someone please send me a virtual hug. 🤍
  • Manjunath Nayak BP said:
    May 22, 2025 AT 03:52
    You think this is about basketball? Nah. This is a psyop. The NBA has been pushing this 'one-man show' narrative for years to distract from the fact that the league is rigged. Think about it-Mitchell was traded here after that whole Jazz drama, right? And now suddenly he's the savior? The Cavs had a .500 record before the playoffs. Now they're alive? Coincidence? I don't think so. The league needs a Cleveland story to sell merch and boost ratings after that whole Warriors dynasty fatigue. They needed a villain in Indiana, so they made Turner look like a clown. And the media? They're all in on it. You think the shot clock manipulation in the fourth quarter was real? No way. They held it at 2.1 seconds for three straight possessions when Mitchell was driving. That's not refs. That's programming. The real game is being played behind the scenes. You think the Pacers' coach didn't know how to defend? He's been in the league 20 years. He's being told to lose this one. Why? Because the next game is in Indiana, and they need the series to go six so the ratings explode. It's all a script. You're being played. Wake up.
  • Tulika Singh said:
    May 22, 2025 AT 11:19
    Sometimes greatness doesn't need justification.
  • naresh g said:
    May 23, 2025 AT 01:29
    Wait, wait, wait-so Mitchell scored 43, right? But how many of those were contested? And how many were off the dribble versus catch-and-shoot? And what was his assist-to-turnover ratio? And did the Pacers switch on screens? Did they use a zone at any point? And what was the defensive rating when he was on the floor versus off? And how many of those points came in the fourth quarter? And how many were in transition? And what was the pace of the game? And did the Cavs' bench outscore Indiana's bench? And what was the net rating? And how many times did they foul? And what was the rebounding margin? And how many offensive boards did they get? And how many second-chance points? And how many three-pointers did they make? And what was their three-point percentage? And how many free throws did they attempt? And how many did they make? And what was their FT%? And did the refs call more fouls on Indiana? And was there a disparity in foul calls? And did the Pacers have any players in foul trouble? And how many minutes did Turner play? And how many did McConnell play? And did the Cavs' spacing improve because of Garland's movement? And was the offense more fluid because of Strus's spacing? And was Okoro's defense on the perimeter the key? And was the defense really as bad as the article says? And did the Pacers' rotation really break down? Or was it just Mitchell being Mitchell? And is this really a turning point? Or just a hot night? And what does the film say? And what do the analytics say? And why is everyone so excited? And why isn't anyone asking the real questions?

Write a comment